Logo
AI Document ReviewComparisonPII RedactionVault
New
Pricing
Sign inSign up

AI Contract Review for Private Equity & M&A Transactions

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
U.S. and England & Wales law
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free to start, no credit card

Private equity and M&A contract review checks how acquisition agreements, investment documents, and transaction contracts allocate risk through representations, warranties, indemnification, and purchase price adjustments. Justee AI analyzes stock purchase agreements, asset purchase agreements, and merger agreements to flag gaps in buyer protections and unfavorable risk allocation that could lead to post-closing disputes and undisclosed liabilities.

Free and no sign-up required.

3 of 3 reviews left this month · Upgrade

Get Your Free Document Review

Anonymous analysis is saved for 24 hours.
Sign up free
Unlock multistate review on any paid plan.
From $19/mo
Unlock Full Private Mode with zero-access encryption.
See plans
0 / 1
Federal

Federal law is always checked. Add up to 1 state.

Your data is protected at every layer

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted after 24 hours

Key Takeaways

Review acquisition agreements for representations and warranties covering material business areas

Check how indemnification provisions protect buyers from pre-closing breaches and undisclosed liabilities

Flag working capital adjustments, earnouts, and purchase price mechanisms that are not clearly defined

Identify gaps in disclosure schedules, survival periods, and claim procedures that could limit post-closing remedies

1-6 minutes*

Average Review Time

1M+ law sections

U.S. and England & Wales legislation

AES-256 encryption, hosted on AWS

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

Private equity acquisitions allocate risk mainly through representations and warranties, indemnification, and purchase price adjustments, and middle-market purchase agreements often run past 100 pages. Representation and warranty insurance (RWI) is common in private equity deals and shapes how indemnities are negotiated. Post-closing disputes often involve working capital adjustments, tax liabilities, undisclosed litigation, and financial statement issues. Key contract elements include fundamental representations with longer survival (organization, capitalization, authority), business representations with shorter survival periods (often 12 to 24 months), materiality qualifiers and knowledge limitations, indemnification caps, baskets and deductibles, escrow arrangements, and dispute resolution procedures. Justee flags gaps in these terms and explains how each one allocates risk. According to Justee (justee.ai), Full Private Mode on paid plans seals reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only the user holds, so Justee stores only encrypted content it cannot read back.

Key Industry Regulations

Securities Act of 1933 - Private Placement Exemptions (Reg D)

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Tender Offer Rules

Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act - Merger Filing Requirements

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 - PE Fund Adviser Requirements

State Corporate Law - Merger and Acquisition Statutes

FINRA Rules - Fairness Opinions and Valuation

SOX Section 404 - Public Company Acquisition Considerations

How It Works

1
Upload Your Contract

Upload your contract as a PDF or DOCX file, or paste the text

2
AI Analysis

Our AI reviews for industry-specific compliance issues

3
Review Findings

Get detailed findings with regulatory citations

4
Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve compliance

What We Check

Rep and warranty review: flags material business areas and seller disclosures the agreement may not cover

Indemnification structure analysis: explains buyer protections through caps, baskets, survival periods, and escrow

Purchase price mechanics: checks whether working capital adjustments, earnouts, and escrow releases are clearly defined

Disclosure schedule assessment: identifies gaps in seller schedules that could widen exceptions to representations

RWI alignment: flags agreement terms that may not fit representation and warranty insurance coverage

Common Risks We Identify

Inadequate financial statement representations allowing undiscovered accounting irregularities to surface post-closing without recourse

Weak tax representations failing to cover pre-closing tax liabilities that become the buyer's responsibility after closing

Short indemnification survival periods (shorter than the statute of limitations) preventing recovery for late-discovered breaches

Ambiguous working capital definitions creating post-closing disputes over purchase price adjustments

Missing environmental representations exposing the buyer to undisclosed contamination and remediation costs

Common Industry Documents

Stock Purchase Agreement

Equity acquisition contract with reps, warranties, and indemnification

Asset Purchase Agreement

Asset acquisition contract allocating assumed and excluded liabilities

Merger Agreement

Statutory merger contract with stockholder approval requirements

Letter of Intent / Term Sheet

Pre-contract document outlining key deal terms and exclusivity

Disclosure Schedules

Seller disclosures providing exceptions to representations and warranties

Illustrative Example

For example, Justee reviews a stock purchase agreement negotiated with the selling shareholders for a private equity fund acquiring a manufacturing business in the Midwest.

Issue Found: The agreement contained broad materiality qualifiers limiting representation scope, had only 12-month survival for non-fundamental reps (limitation periods for fraud claims run several years in many states), used a working capital definition that omitted seasonal inventory adjustments, and lacked specific environmental representations regarding soil contamination at manufacturing facilities

Next step: Justee flagged the double materiality, the short survival periods, the working capital gap, and the missing environmental reps, and suggested edits the buyer could accept or reject: removing double materiality qualifiers, extending survival for business and tax reps, adding a seasonal inventory normalization formula, and adding environmental representations with Phase I and II assessment requirements and specific contamination disclosures

Inadequate Financial Statement Representation

Problematic Language

"The Financial Statements fairly present the financial condition of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis."

Example wording (illustrative; have a lawyer review before using)

"The Financial Statements (including balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements, and footnotes) fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated, and have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis throughout the periods indicated (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto). The Financial Statements accurately reflect all liabilities (whether accrued, absolute, contingent, or otherwise) of the Company required to be reflected or reserved against under GAAP. The Company maintains a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that (a) transactions are executed with management's authorization, (b) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP, and (c) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management's authorization. Since the Balance Sheet Date, there has been no Material Adverse Change in the business, assets, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company. The Company has no off-balance-sheet arrangements or liabilities."

Why it matters: The original language is too thin for a private equity acquisition. Without specific coverage of liabilities (contingent and otherwise), internal controls, Material Adverse Change, and off-balance-sheet arrangements, buyers may lack recourse for common financial statement issues, and "fairly present" is open to interpretation disputes. Buyers usually want granular representations covering GAAP compliance, internal controls, completeness of liabilities, and absence of undisclosed arrangements. The revised language sets specific financial statement representations covering the issues that most often lead to post-closing disputes.

No credit card required
"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process while reducing stress."
Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Grayver Law Group · Advisor to Justee

Why Justee

Justee AI vs. General Chatbots vs. Other Legal AI

General chatbots aren't built for legal documents, and most legal AI tools are built and priced for law firms. Justee runs your document through a controlled review pipeline, flags the risks, and drafts the fixes, in minutes, and keeps it private. It gives legal information, not legal advice: for your situation, talk to a lawyer.

Recommended

Justee AI

ReviewsComparisonsStorageEditorChat

1-6 min

Speed

$16+/mo

Free to start

1M+ sections

Legislation

Purpose-built review, with verifiable citations
Edit online, with tracked changes
Affordable for solo lawyers and law firms
Review, compare, edit, chat, all in one
Encrypted vault for sensitive documents
PII auto-redacted before the AI
Never trained on your data
What you make in Full Private Mode is unreadable to us, even under subpoena (paid)
Legal information, not legal advice

General AI Chatbots

Chat

Minutes

Speed

$20+/mo

Subscription

General

Coverage

Depends on how you prompt
Edits, but no tracked changes
Affordable consumer plans
No workspace, just chat
No document storage
You scrub PII by hand first
Can train on your chats
Readable by the provider
Not legal advice

Other Legal AI Tools

ReviewsDrafting

Minutes

Speed

Varies

Usually pricier

Varies

Coverage

Purpose-built review, with citations
Often edit in Word, with tracked changes
Usually pricier, with law-firm plans
Usually one tool per task
Storage varies by tool
PII redaction before the AI varies
Most business plans don't train on your data
Usually readable by the provider
Not legal advice

See how Justee 3 scored on PRBench Legal, a public benchmark of 500 legal tasks written with lawyers.

*Estimates based on industry research and internal testing. Review times based on typical 5-50 page contracts. Legislation: over 1 million sections of U.S. and England & Wales legislation. Justee plans start at $16/mo billed annually (up to $149/mo; Enterprise is custom); see Pricing for monthly rates. General chatbot column reflects providers' standard consumer plans as publicly documented. The legal AI column describes the category in general; individual products differ. Justee is not a law firm and does not replace a lawyer. PII detection is best-effort and may not catch every identifier.

Official Regulatory Resources

ABA Model Stock Purchase Agreement

American Bar Association model acquisition agreement provisions

SRS Acquiom M&A Deal Terms Study

Annual analysis of private M&A deal terms and market trends

SEC M&A Disclosure Requirements

Securities and Exchange Commission guidance on merger and acquisition disclosure obligations

Related Industry Reviews

Financial Services Contract ReviewLegal Services Contract ReviewProfessional Services Contract ReviewPrivate Equity Contract Comparison
Important Legal Disclaimer

What Justee AI is — and what it is not. Justee AI is a software platform, not a law firm. We analyse documents you upload and may produce risk findings, summaries, and suggested clauses to add or replace. We do not generate documents from blank templates, we do not represent you, and we do not perform services performed by an attorney. Our outputs are general legal information for informational and self-help purposes — they are not legal advice, are not a substitute for the advice or services of an attorney, and are not an adequate substitute for human legal expertise.

No attorney in the loop. Justee AI is AI-powered. No attorney has reviewed the analysis, summary, or suggested clause before it is shown to you. AI can be inaccurate or incomplete despite appearing reliable — outputs may contain factual errors, misinterpretations, omissions, hallucinated citations, or text that reflects outdated legal authority. We strongly recommend that you have any output — including suggested clauses you might add to or substitute into a contract — reviewed by a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the relevant jurisdiction before you sign, send, or otherwise rely on it.

No attorney–client relationship. Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justee AI (First AI Corp.) or any of its personnel. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a licensed attorney. Legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and the facts of your situation. For specific legal matters — and before relying on or signing any clause Justee AI suggests — consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Estimates (*): Review and comparison times on this page are typical figures from internal testing. Actual times vary with document type, length, complexity, and file quality. Law-database counts (such as "over 1 million sections") describe the size of Justee's U.S. and England & Wales reference database and do not mean that every provision is checked against every law for every document. Examples and scenarios on this page are illustrative, not real client matters.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Critical reps and warranties include: (1) Organization and authority - corporate existence, power to enter agreement, board/stockholder approval, (2) Capitalization - all outstanding equity, options, warrants, convertible securities with no undisclosed equity rights, (3) Financial statements - GAAP compliance, internal controls, no undisclosed liabilities, (4) Absence of changes - no Material Adverse Change since balance sheet date, (5) Compliance with laws - regulatory compliance, permits, licenses, (6) Litigation - all pending or threatened legal proceedings, (7) Tax matters - tax returns filed, taxes paid, no audits or disputes, (8) Assets - ownership, condition, sufficiency of assets, (9) Intellectual property - ownership, validity, no infringement, (10) Material contracts - list of all material agreements, no defaults, (11) Employees and labor - compensation, benefits, union status, disputes, (12) Environmental - compliance with environmental laws, no contamination. Fundamental reps (organization, authority, capitalization) typically survive indefinitely or 5-10 years; other reps survive 12-24 months.

Indemnification provisions should specify: (1) Scope - indemnity for breach of reps/warranties, covenants, and specified liabilities, (2) Survival periods - fundamental reps (5-10 years or indefinite), tax reps (statute of limitations + 60 days), other reps (12-24 months), (3) Caps - overall cap typically 10-15% of purchase price for general reps, 50-100% for fundamental reps, (4) Baskets - deductible (indemnity only for claims exceeding threshold, typically 0.5-1% of purchase price) or tipping basket (full indemnity once threshold exceeded), (5) Escrow - 10-15% of purchase price held 12-24 months as indemnity source, (6) Exclusive remedy - indemnity as sole remedy except fraud, (7) Claim procedures - notice requirements, defense rights, settlement approval, (8) Mitigation - obligation to mitigate damages and offset by insurance/third-party recoveries, (9) No double recovery - prohibition on recovering same loss through multiple provisions. Structure must balance buyer protection with seller exit certainty.

Purchase price adjustment mechanisms should address: (1) Target working capital - define normalized working capital based on historical averages (typically trailing 12 months), (2) Components - specify included current assets (A/R, inventory, prepaid) and current liabilities (A/P, accrued expenses), (3) Exclusions - exclude cash, debt, transaction expenses from working capital calculation, (4) Closing statement - seller prepares estimated closing working capital, buyer prepares final within 60-90 days, (5) Dispute resolution - independent accounting firm resolves disputes (typically Big 4), (6) Adjustment formula - dollar-for-dollar adjustment for deviation from target (e.g., if actual $2M below target, price reduced $2M), (7) Earnout provisions - if applicable, clearly define performance metrics (revenue, EBITDA), measurement periods, calculation methodology, and payment timing, (8) Purchase price allocation - allocate price to assets for tax purposes per Section 1060. Working capital is a frequent source of post-closing disputes, so precise definitions matter.

Materiality qualifiers and knowledge limitations significantly narrow rep scope: (1) Material/Materiality - undefined "material" creates interpretation disputes; define specific thresholds (e.g., "exceeding $100,000" or "would not result in liability exceeding $50,000"), (2) Material Adverse Effect/Change - define specifically what constitutes MAE (typically excludes general economic conditions, industry changes, natural disasters, war, and effects of transaction announcement), (3) Double materiality scrape - remove materiality qualifiers from indemnification provisions (e.g., "Buyer may recover for breach of any representation without regard to materiality qualifiers in representation"), (4) Knowledge qualifiers - "to Seller's knowledge" limits scope; define whose knowledge (officers, key employees) and whether includes constructive knowledge or inquiry obligation, (5) Best of knowledge - avoid vague phrases; specify "actual knowledge without duty of inquiry" vs. "knowledge after reasonable inquiry", (6) Sandbagging - address whether buyer can claim indemnity for breaches known before closing (pro-sandbagging vs. anti-sandbagging provisions). Private equity buyers should minimize materiality qualifiers and knowledge limitations to maximize coverage breadth.

Justee reviews these contracts against Securities Act of 1933 and related rules. General-purpose AI chatbots often stop at surface issues like vague terms; Justee flags industry-specific compliance gaps, risk allocation, regulatory responsibilities, audit and inspection rights, and indemnification language, and cites the law behind each finding. It suggests edits as tracked changes you can accept or reject, each with a plain-English explanation of why the clause matters.

Whichever you select. Justee applies U.S. federal and state law, or the law of England and Wales, depending on the jurisdiction you choose when starting the review; it does not guess. Any U.S. state can be selected. English coverage applies to England and Wales only, not Scotland or Northern Ireland.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Detection is best-effort and cannot guarantee catching everything: certain rare identifiers (such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses) may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

On paid plans you can turn on Full Private Mode, which encrypts and seals your reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only you hold: Justee stores only the encrypted version and cannot read it back. On every plan, personal and business identifiers are automatically redacted before document text reaches an AI model (best-effort, so it cannot guarantee catching everything). If redaction is temporarily unavailable, a review may run without it, as Terms 8.5 explain. Nothing you submit is used to train AI models.

Ready to Review Your Contract?

Upload your contract above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: October 14, 2026

Privacy

Full Private Mode

Legal

Terms of servicePrivacy policy

About

About usContactsBlogAffiliate program

Follow us

LinkedIn
logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.

Justee is not a law firm. It provides legal information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.