Free Legal Brief Review

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
Guided by Grayver Law Group
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free during early access

Have your legal brief reviewed by AI before filing. Fast, expert identification of weak authority, missing record citations, and structural problems that lose appellate panels.

Free and no sign-up required.

Get Your Free Document Review

Federal only

Your data is protected at every layer

No file selected

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted within 24 hours

Key Takeaways

AI flags vacated, reversed, or distinguished controlling authority

Detect page/word-count violations and font-rule defects

Identify record citations that don't support the proposition

Free review aligned with Bluebook and federal-rule formatting

1-2 minutes*

Average Review Time

230+ compliance points analyzed*

Compliance Checks

Bank-level AES-256 encryption

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

Justee's AI-powered legal brief review tool analyzes trial and appellate briefs for citation accuracy, persuasive structure, page-limit and font compliance, and record-citation integrity. The tool checks each cited authority against subsequent treatment to flag vacated, reversed, abrogated, or distinguished cases. It validates Bluebook citation format, computes word counts under FRAP 32 and the local appellate rules, and verifies that every record citation maps to an actual record entry. Justee evaluates the brief's structural persuasion: whether the question presented is framed for the relief sought, whether headings function as a self-contained roadmap, and whether the standard of review is correctly stated. Briefs persuade by clarity and credibility. Common brief failures include reliance on overruled authority, mis-cited record evidence, and statement-of-the-case sections that read as advocacy rather than fact. Professional brief review reduces credibility loss and supports the panel's skim test.

How It Works

1

Upload Your Document

Upload your contract in PDF, DOCX, or TXT format

2

AI Analysis

Our AI reviews your document for compliance issues

3

Review Findings

Get detailed findings with risk ratings and legal citations

4

Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve your document

What We Check

Citation validity (KeyCite-style flags)

FRAP 32 / local-rule word and font compliance

Record-citation accuracy and pin-cite checks

Question presented and standard of review

Heading and roadmap persuasion

Common Risks We Identify

Reliance on vacated or reversed authority

Word count exceeds rule limit

Record cite to wrong page/exhibit

Standard of review misstated

Statement of facts argued instead of stated

Hypothetical Case Study by Justee

Justee recently analyzed a 13,400-word opening brief citing 47 authorities for a regional firm filing an opening brief in the Ninth Circuit on a securities arbitration appeal.

Issue Found: Two leading citations had been abrogated by Henry Schein in 2019 but were still framed as controlling. The word count was 14,100 — 100 over the FRAP 32(a)(7) limit. The standard of review was stated as "abuse of discretion" when the issue was de novo.

Justee Recommendation: We replaced the abrogated authority with current Ninth Circuit precedent, restructured the argument under the correct de novo standard, and trimmed 800 words by collapsing two redundant sub-arguments. Brief was accepted for filing on first attempt.

Misstated Standard of Review

Problematic Language

"This Court reviews the district court's denial of the motion to compel arbitration for abuse of discretion."

Recommended Language

"This Court reviews de novo the district court's denial of a motion to compel arbitration. Brennan v. Opus Bank, 796 F.3d 1125, 1128 (9th Cir. 2015). Whether the parties agreed to arbitrate is a question of contract interpretation reviewed without deference."

Why it matters: The standard of review controls the appellate analysis. Misstating it signals a brief drafted carelessly and forfeits arguments that turn on de novo treatment. Get the standard right with controlling authority on page one of the argument.

No credit card required

"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process across all practice areas, transforming hours of work into minutes, while reducing stress and boosting accuracy."

Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Corporate Transactions at Grayver Law Group

AI Review vs. Manual Review

FeatureJustee AI ReviewManual Review
Review Time2-5 minutes2-4 hours
CostFree trial available$150-500+
Legal CitationsAutomaticVaries by reviewer
Clause SuggestionsIncludedExtra fee
Availability24/7 instantBusiness hours
* Comparison data represents estimates based on industry research and internal testing for typical contract types. Review times, costs, and accuracy percentages vary by document complexity, length, jurisdiction, and specific legal requirements. See full disclaimer below.

Official Resources

FRAP Rule 32

Federal appellate brief format and length

US Courts — Appellate Rules

Official Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure

Cornell Law: Brief

Legal definition of a brief

Important Legal Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information and analysis provided by Justee AI is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to provide accurate and helpful information, our AI-powered service is not a substitute for professional legal counsel.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney-client relationship. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a Professional: For specific legal matters, we strongly recommend consulting with a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Legal requirements vary by location and circumstances, and only a licensed attorney can provide advice tailored to your specific situation.

Performance Estimates (*): All statistics, metrics, and numerical claims on this page — including review times, cost comparisons, accuracy percentages, and database size — are estimates based on internal testing, industry research, and typical use cases. Actual results vary based on document type, complexity, length, jurisdiction, and other factors. Cost comparisons reference publicly available average attorney rates and are not guaranteed savings. "1M+ laws and regulations" refers to the breadth of Justee's reference database and does not imply that every provision is checked against every law for every document.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Legal Brief Review FAQ

Justee flags authorities that have been vacated, reversed, abrogated, or distinguished based on its training data and surfaces them for verification against a live citator before filing.

Yes. Justee applies FRAP 32 word-count rules and local circuit variations and flags briefs that exceed the limit, including footnotes when counted.

Justee maps each issue to the controlling standard (de novo, clear error, abuse of discretion, substantial evidence) and flags mismatches.

Yes. Justee checks FRAP 29 amicus rules, including consent/leave-to-file disclosures and word-count differences.

No. Justee provides analytical review; complex appeals warrant licensed appellate counsel. The output focuses appellate-counsel time on substance instead of compliance.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Our system achieves 100% detection of standard PII types and approximately 97% overall coverage. Certain rare identifiers — such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses — may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

Ready to Review Your Document?

Upload your document above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: May 13, 2026

Privacy

Follow us

LinkedIn

logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.