Data Processing Agreement Review: Check Your DPA for GDPR Gaps

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
U.S. and England & Wales law
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free to start, no credit card

Data processing agreement (DPA) review helps businesses check a vendor's data processing terms before they sign. Justee reads the DPA clause by clause, checks it against GDPR Article 28, CCPA, and HIPAA requirements, and flags gaps in data handling, security measures, breach notification, and sub-processor terms.

Free and no sign-up required.

3 of 3 reviews left this month · Upgrade

Get Your Free Document Review

Anonymous analysis is saved for 24 hours.
Sign up free
Unlock multistate review on any paid plan.
From $19/mo
Unlock Full Private Mode with zero-access encryption.
See plans
0 / 1
Federal

Federal law is always checked. Add up to 1 state.

Your data is protected at every layer

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted after 24 hours

Key Takeaways

Check the DPA against GDPR Article 28, CCPA, and HIPAA requirements and see the gaps flagged

Review data security measures, encryption, and access controls

Check breach notification obligations, timing, and responsibilities

Assess sub-processor terms and safeguards for international data transfers

1-6 minutes*

Average Review Time

1M+ law sections

U.S. and England & Wales legislation

Privacy-focused document handling

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

Under GDPR Article 28, a processor that handles personal data on behalf of a controller must work under a contract that sets out mandatory terms, including processing only on documented instructions, confidentiality for the people handling the data, appropriate security measures, rules for engaging sub-processors, help with data subject requests, deletion or return of the data when the service ends, and access to the information needed for audits. Under Article 33, a controller must report a personal data breach to the supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of it, and a processor must tell the controller without undue delay. The most serious GDPR infringements can draw fines of up to EUR 20 million or 4% of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. A vendor's standard DPA may leave some of these terms out or describe them only in general language. According to Justee (justee.ai), Full Private Mode on paid plans seals reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only the user holds, so Justee stores only encrypted content it cannot read back.

Your DPA Sets the Rules for How a Vendor Handles Your Data

Your vendor will process personal data on your behalf: customer information, employee data, or health records. GDPR, CCPA, and other privacy laws require a data processing agreement (DPA) that governs how the vendor handles that data. As the controller, you generally stay responsible for it, and the DPA is where the vendor's obligations are written down.

Accepting vague security terms that leave the vendor's obligations unclear after a breach

Missing terms that GDPR Article 28 requires in every processor contract

Allowing unrestricted sub-processors or international data transfers without safeguards

Agreeing to loose breach notification terms that make the 72-hour GDPR reporting window harder to meet

Clause-by-Clause DPA Review Against GDPR Article 28

Upload a data processing agreement and Justee checks it against GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA requirements, then flags gaps in data security, breach response, and processor obligations, with citations to the law behind each finding.

See where the DPA falls short of GDPR Article 28, CCPA, and HIPAA requirements

Review data security measures including encryption, access controls, and security standards

Assess breach notification obligations including timing, scope, and assistance requirements

Check sub-processor terms, approval requirements, and liability provisions

Evaluate international data transfer mechanisms and adequacy decisions

How It Works

1
Upload Data Processing Agreement

Upload your DPA, vendor data privacy addendum, or related GDPR documents for review.

2
Privacy Requirements Check

AI checks the DPA against GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA requirements and reviews data security, breach notification, and processor obligations.

3
Review Flagged Gaps

Get a clause-by-clause report of missing provisions, vague security terms, weak breach terms, and the law each finding points to.

4
Raise Changes with the Vendor

Use the findings to ask the vendor for DPA changes, extra safeguards, or standard contractual clauses before you sign. For advice on your situation, talk to a privacy lawyer.

Illustrative Example

Scenario: E-commerce company reviewing a data processing agreement with a marketing automation vendor that processes customer data

Challenge: The company planned to use a marketing vendor to process customer email addresses, purchase history, and behavioral data for personalized campaigns. Some of those customers were in the EU, so the DPA had to meet GDPR Article 28.

Outcome: Justee flagged several gaps. The DPA used general data protection language but left out specific Article 28 terms, processing instructions were vague, security was described only as "industry standard" with no encryption requirement, the vendor could add sub-processors with notice only, some sub-processors sat in countries without an EU adequacy decision and no safeguards were named, breach notice was "prompt" with no fixed deadline, help with data subject requests was limited to "commercially reasonable efforts", and data was deleted after termination only "upon request". With that list, the company asked the vendor for the missing Article 28 terms, named security measures, prior approval of new sub-processors, Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers, breach notice within a short, fixed deadline, and automatic deletion after termination.

No credit card required
"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process while reducing stress."
Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Grayver Law Group · Advisor to Justee

Why Justee

Justee AI vs. General Chatbots vs. Other Legal AI

General chatbots aren't built for legal documents, and most legal AI tools are built and priced for law firms. Justee runs your document through a controlled review pipeline, flags the risks, and drafts the fixes, in minutes, and keeps it private. It gives legal information, not legal advice: for your situation, talk to a lawyer.

Recommended

Justee AI

ReviewsComparisonsStorageEditorChat

1-6 min

Speed

$16+/mo

Free to start

1M+ sections

Legislation

Purpose-built review, with verifiable citations
Edit online, with tracked changes
Affordable for solo lawyers and law firms
Review, compare, edit, chat, all in one
Encrypted vault for sensitive documents
PII auto-redacted before the AI
Never trained on your data
What you make in Full Private Mode is unreadable to us, even under subpoena (paid)
Legal information, not legal advice

General AI Chatbots

Chat

Minutes

Speed

$20+/mo

Subscription

General

Coverage

Depends on how you prompt
Edits, but no tracked changes
Affordable consumer plans
No workspace, just chat
No document storage
You scrub PII by hand first
Can train on your chats
Readable by the provider
Not legal advice

Other Legal AI Tools

ReviewsDrafting

Minutes

Speed

Varies

Usually pricier

Varies

Coverage

Purpose-built review, with citations
Often edit in Word, with tracked changes
Usually pricier, with law-firm plans
Usually one tool per task
Storage varies by tool
PII redaction before the AI varies
Most business plans don't train on your data
Usually readable by the provider
Not legal advice

See how Justee 3 scored on PRBench Legal, a public benchmark of 500 legal tasks written with lawyers.

*Estimates based on industry research and internal testing. Review times based on typical 5-50 page contracts. Legislation: over 1 million sections of U.S. and England & Wales legislation. Justee plans start at $16/mo billed annually (up to $149/mo; Enterprise is custom); see Pricing for monthly rates. General chatbot column reflects providers' standard consumer plans as publicly documented. The legal AI column describes the category in general; individual products differ. Justee is not a law firm and does not replace a lawyer. PII detection is best-effort and may not catch every identifier.

Additional Resources

GDPR Article 28 Requirements

Text and explanation of GDPR Article 28 processor requirements

FTC Privacy and Data Security Resources

Federal Trade Commission privacy and data security guidance

NIST Privacy Framework

National Institute of Standards and Technology privacy and data processing framework

Important Legal Disclaimer

What Justee AI is — and what it is not. Justee AI is a software platform, not a law firm. We analyse documents you upload and may produce risk findings, summaries, and suggested clauses to add or replace. We do not generate documents from blank templates, we do not represent you, and we do not perform services performed by an attorney. Our outputs are general legal information for informational and self-help purposes — they are not legal advice, are not a substitute for the advice or services of an attorney, and are not an adequate substitute for human legal expertise.

No attorney in the loop. Justee AI is AI-powered. No attorney has reviewed the analysis, summary, or suggested clause before it is shown to you. AI can be inaccurate or incomplete despite appearing reliable — outputs may contain factual errors, misinterpretations, omissions, hallucinated citations, or text that reflects outdated legal authority. We strongly recommend that you have any output — including suggested clauses you might add to or substitute into a contract — reviewed by a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the relevant jurisdiction before you sign, send, or otherwise rely on it.

No attorney–client relationship. Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justee AI (First AI Corp.) or any of its personnel. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a licensed attorney. Legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and the facts of your situation. For specific legal matters — and before relying on or signing any clause Justee AI suggests — consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Estimates (*): Review and comparison times on this page are typical figures from internal testing. Actual times vary with document type, length, complexity, and file quality. Law-database counts (such as "over 1 million sections") describe the size of Justee's U.S. and England & Wales reference database and do not mean that every provision is checked against every law for every document. Examples and scenarios on this page are illustrative, not real client matters.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

A DPA is a contract between a data controller (you) and a data processor (your vendor) that governs how the processor handles personal data on your behalf. GDPR Article 28 requires one whenever a processor handles personal data for a controller covered by GDPR. The CCPA requires a written contract with service providers that process California consumers' personal information, and HIPAA requires a business associate agreement when a vendor handles protected health information on behalf of a covered entity. Other privacy laws may set their own contract requirements.

GDPR Article 28 requires the contract to say that the processor: processes data only on documented instructions from the controller, makes sure the people processing the data are bound by confidentiality, implements appropriate technical and organizational security measures, engages sub-processors only with the controller's authorization, helps the controller respond to data subject requests, helps with security, breach notification, and impact assessments, deletes or returns the data when the services end, makes information available for audits, and immediately tells the controller if, in its opinion, an instruction infringes GDPR. These terms are required whatever else the DPA says.

Common terms include encryption at rest and in transit (for example, AES-256 and TLS), access limited to authorized personnel, logging and monitoring of data access, regular security testing and vulnerability assessments, incident response procedures, staff security training, and security certifications such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001. GDPR Articles 28 and 32 call for appropriate technical and organizational measures, so many controllers ask for specific measures instead of vague "industry standard" wording, with stricter terms for sensitive personal data.

Sub-processors are third parties your vendor uses to process your data, such as cloud hosting, analytics, or support providers. They have access to your data and add their own security risks. Under GDPR, a processor may not engage a sub-processor without the controller's prior specific or general written authorization, and the original processor remains fully liable to the controller for a sub-processor's performance (Article 28(4)). Common DPA terms include prior approval of new sub-processors, a list of current sub-processors, the same data protection obligations passed down to each one, and the vendor's liability for their failures. Justee flags sub-processor terms that give you no chance to object.

GDPR requires controllers to notify the supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of a breach. GDPR requires processors to notify the controller "without undue delay", so many controllers ask the DPA to set a short, fixed deadline as well. A DPA can also spell out what the notice must include (the nature of the breach, the records affected, likely consequences) and how the processor will help with the investigation and with notifications to authorities and individuals. A vague "prompt" notice term can leave the controller less time to meet its own reporting deadline.

Both U.S. and English law. Select a U.S. jurisdiction (any U.S. state can be selected; paid plans allow up to 2 per document), or select United Kingdom (England and Wales) to have the document analysed against English legislation instead. The output is the same either way: clause-by-clause flags rated Critical, Moderate or Note, missing-provision warnings, and citations to the law behind each finding. Scots law and Northern Ireland law are not supported.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Detection is best-effort and cannot guarantee catching everything: certain rare identifiers (such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses) may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

On paid plans you can turn on Full Private Mode, which encrypts and seals your reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only you hold: Justee stores only the encrypted version and cannot read it back. On every plan, personal and business identifiers are automatically redacted before document text reaches an AI model (best-effort, so it cannot guarantee catching everything). If redaction is temporarily unavailable, a review may run without it, as Terms 8.5 explain. Nothing you submit is used to train AI models.

Ready to Review Your Contract?

Get a clause-by-clause AI contract review, typically in 1 to 6 minutes.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: October 14, 2026

Privacy

Full Private Mode

Legal

Terms of servicePrivacy policy

Follow us

LinkedIn

logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.

Justee is not a law firm. It provides legal information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.