AI Visa Documentation Review

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
Guided by Grayver Law Group
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free during early access

A U.S. visa petition package — H-1B, L-1, O-1, EB-1, EB-2 NIW, EB-3, F-1, B-1/B-2 — combines forms, support letters, evidence exhibits, and beneficiary credentials that must be internally consistent and meet category-specific evidentiary prongs. Justee reviews visa documentation against the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA, 8 USC), 8 CFR regulations, the USCIS Policy Manual, and the Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual to flag cross-document inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and RFE-trigger patterns before filing.

Free and no sign-up required.

Get Your Free Document Review

Federal only

Your data is protected at every layer

No file selected

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted within 24 hours

Key Takeaways

8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) defines H-1B specialty occupation as requiring theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge with a bachelor's minimum

Cross-document inconsistency between Form I-129, support letters, and beneficiary CVs is the single largest driver of USCIS RFEs

O-1 petitions under 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3) require evidence under at least three of eight criteria; EB-1A under 8 CFR §204.5(h) requires three of ten

30-60 seconds*

Average Review Time

125+ compliance points analyzed*

Compliance Checks

Bank-level AES-256 encryption

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

U.S. visa documentation operates under a layered legal framework: the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA, codified at 8 USC) sets statutory categories and standards, 8 CFR regulations implement procedural and evidentiary rules, the USCIS Policy Manual provides authoritative interpretation (binding on adjudicators), and the Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual governs consular processing. Each category has distinct evidentiary prongs: H-1B specialty occupation under 8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) requires theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge plus a bachelor's degree minimum; O-1 extraordinary ability under 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3) requires evidence under at least three of eight criteria; EB-1A under 8 CFR §204.5(h) requires three of ten criteria plus a final-merits determination under the Kazarian two-step analysis (Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010)); and EB-2 National Interest Waiver under Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016) requires three prongs (substantial merit and national importance, well-positioned to advance, and balance favoring waiver of labor certification). Cross-document inconsistencies between Form I-129/I-140, support letters, beneficiary CVs, degree evaluations, and Labor Condition Application wage levels are the single largest driver of USCIS Requests for Evidence — delaying adjudication by 60-180 days and, in cap-subject H-1B cases, putting the entire petition at risk. Justee analyzes visa documentation against this layered framework so applicants, employers, and counsel can identify gaps before USCIS does.

How It Works

1

Upload Your Document

Upload your contract in PDF, DOCX, or TXT format

2

AI Analysis

Our AI reviews your document for compliance issues

3

Review Findings

Get detailed findings with risk ratings and legal citations

4

Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve your document

What We Check

Detects mismatches between I-129, support letters, beneficiary CVs, and degree evaluations

Maps evidence to each statutory prong (specialty occupation, extraordinary ability, NIW Dhanasar)

Surfaces RFE-trigger patterns USCIS routinely cites (vague duties, generic letters, missing equivalency)

Verifies LCA wage-level alignment with Form I-129 duty descriptions

Confirms required forms, fees, and supporting documents are present and current

Common Risks We Identify

Job title mismatch between Form I-129 and support letter triggering specialty-occupation RFE

LCA wage-level too low for the duty complexity described in the I-129

O-1 petition evidence touching only two of the required three §214.2(o)(3) criteria

Degree evaluation missing for foreign credentials, defeating bachelor's-equivalency prong

EB-2 NIW petition failing the Dhanasar prong-three balance-of-equities analysis

Hypothetical Case Study by Justee

Justee recently analyzed a Form I-129 H-1B petition package: I-129 listing job title "Software Developer" at Wage Level II, a six-page support letter describing duties consistent with a senior DevOps Engineer (production infrastructure ownership, on-call rotation, cross-team architecture decisions), the beneficiary's CV listing five years as "DevOps Engineer," a degree evaluation issued in 2019, and an LCA filed at OES Wage Level II for SOC 15-1252 (Software Developers) for a 180-person growth-stage SaaS company filing an H-1B petition for a senior backend engineer with five years of experience and an Indian B.Tech in Computer Science, where the engineer had been on F-1 OPT and the cap-subject H-1B was the only path to continued employment.

Issue Found: Three cross-document inconsistencies set up an almost-certain specialty-occupation RFE under 8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A): (1) the job title on Form I-129 ("Software Developer") did not match the duties described in the support letter (DevOps Engineer functions including production infrastructure ownership and on-call rotation) or the beneficiary's CV ("DevOps Engineer"); (2) the LCA was filed at Wage Level II for SOC 15-1252 (Software Developers), but the duty complexity described in the support letter — independent judgment, architecture authority, on-call production ownership — corresponded to Wage Level III for SOC 15-1244 (Network and Computer Systems Administrators) or 15-1299 (Computer Occupations, All Other); (3) the 2019 degree evaluation was 5+ years old and used outdated AACRAO methodology, creating bachelor's-equivalency exposure. Each issue independently risked an RFE; together they risked outright denial and forfeit of the cap-subject filing window.

Justee Recommendation: We restructured the package before filing: (i) Form I-129 job title amended to "DevOps Engineer" with SOC code corrected to 15-1244, (ii) LCA withdrawn and refiled at Wage Level III for SOC 15-1244, properly aligned with duty complexity, (iii) support letter rewritten to specifically map each duty category to the §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1)-(4) specialty-occupation criteria with citations to USCIS Policy Manual Volume 2, Part F, Chapter 2, (iv) a current 2026 degree evaluation obtained from a NACES-credentialed evaluator using current AACRAO methodology to confirm B.Tech equivalency to a U.S. bachelor's in Computer Science, and (v) supplementary evidence package added documenting the position's industry-standard requirement of a degree in Computer Science or closely related field. The petition was filed cap-subject, selected in the lottery, and approved in 28 days under premium processing with no RFE issued — preserving cap eligibility and avoiding the 60-180 day RFE delay that would have put the start date at risk.

Cross-Document Job Title and Duties Mismatch

Problematic Language

"Form I-129, Part 5, Item 2 (Job Title): "Software Developer." LCA: SOC 15-1252 Wage Level II. Support Letter: "Beneficiary will own production infrastructure, lead on-call rotation, and make cross-team architecture decisions across our cloud platform." Beneficiary CV: "DevOps Engineer, 2021-Present.""

Recommended Language

"Form I-129, Part 5, Item 2 (Job Title): "DevOps Engineer." LCA: SOC 15-1244 (Network and Computer Systems Administrators) Wage Level III, properly aligned with duty complexity including independent judgment, architecture authority, and production-system ownership. Support Letter: "Beneficiary will serve as DevOps Engineer with responsibilities including: (a) ownership of production infrastructure across the cloud platform, requiring theoretical and practical application of distributed-systems principles taught at the bachelor's degree level in Computer Science or closely related field; (b) primary on-call rotation for production incidents, requiring specialized knowledge of [specific technologies]; and (c) cross-team architecture decisions on [specific architecture domains]. The position satisfies 8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) because [map each criterion]." Beneficiary CV: "DevOps Engineer, 2021-Present" (consistent with I-129 and support letter)."

Why it matters: Cross-document consistency between job title, duties, LCA wage level, and beneficiary CV is what USCIS adjudicators check first. Specialty-occupation RFEs almost always trace back to one of these mismatches. Aligning all four documents with explicit §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) criteria mapping in the support letter is the single highest-leverage RFE-prevention move available pre-filing.

No credit card required

"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process across all practice areas, transforming hours of work into minutes, while reducing stress and boosting accuracy."

Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Corporate Transactions at Grayver Law Group

AI Review vs. Manual Review

FeatureJustee AI ReviewManual Review
Review Time2-5 minutes2-4 hours
CostFree trial available$150-500+
Legal CitationsAutomaticVaries by reviewer
Clause SuggestionsIncludedExtra fee
Availability24/7 instantBusiness hours
* Comparison data represents estimates based on industry research and internal testing for typical contract types. Review times, costs, and accuracy percentages vary by document complexity, length, jurisdiction, and specific legal requirements. See full disclaimer below.

Official Resources

USCIS Policy Manual

Official USCIS interpretive guidance

8 CFR Immigration Regulations

Federal immigration regulations

DOS Foreign Affairs Manual

State Department consular-processing manual

Important Legal Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information and analysis provided by Justee AI is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to provide accurate and helpful information, our AI-powered service is not a substitute for professional legal counsel.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney-client relationship. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a Professional: For specific legal matters, we strongly recommend consulting with a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Legal requirements vary by location and circumstances, and only a licensed attorney can provide advice tailored to your specific situation.

Performance Estimates (*): All statistics, metrics, and numerical claims on this page — including review times, cost comparisons, accuracy percentages, and database size — are estimates based on internal testing, industry research, and typical use cases. Actual results vary based on document type, complexity, length, jurisdiction, and other factors. Cost comparisons reference publicly available average attorney rates and are not guaranteed savings. "1M+ laws and regulations" refers to the breadth of Justee's reference database and does not imply that every provision is checked against every law for every document.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Visa Documentation Review FAQ

Common triggers include vague duty descriptions, generic support letters, missing degree equivalencies, LCA wage-level misalignment, and cross-document inconsistencies between forms, letters, and CVs. Justee surfaces these patterns pre-filing.

8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) requires theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge with a U.S. bachelor's degree minimum (or foreign equivalent) in a specific specialty. Justee maps duties to this standard with USCIS Policy Manual citations.

8 CFR §214.2(o)(3) lists eight evidentiary criteria; petitioners must satisfy at least three under USCIS's two-step Kazarian analysis. Justee maps evidence to each criterion and flags weak prongs.

Yes — Justee reviews DS-160 forms, support letters, and supporting documents for consular processing under the Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual. Country-specific consular requirements apply.

No. Complex visa cases — particularly EB-1, EB-2 NIW, and contested H-1B refilings — benefit from immigration counsel. Justee accelerates pre-filing review and RFE-prevention before counsel involvement.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Our system achieves 100% detection of standard PII types and approximately 97% overall coverage. Certain rare identifiers — such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses — may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

Ready to Review Your Document?

Upload your document above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: May 13, 2026

Privacy

Follow us

LinkedIn

logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.