Logo
AI Document Review
Free
Comparison
Free
PII Redaction
Free
Pricing
Sign inSign up

AI Internal Memorandum Review

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
Guided by Grayver Law Group
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free during early access

An internal memorandum — board memos, legal memos, compliance memos, or executive memos — communicates analysis, recommendations, or decisions inside the company. Justee reviews internal memoranda for attorney-client privilege markings, work-product positioning, factual accuracy, and disclosure risks under FRCP 26 and SEC Reg FD.

Free and no sign-up required.

Get Your Free Document Review

Federal only

Your data is protected at every layer

No file selected

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted within 24 hours

Key Takeaways

Memos labeled "Privileged & Confidential — Attorney Work Product" must be authored or directed by counsel for legal advice

Distribution to non-need-to-know recipients can waive privilege under Upjohn v. United States and progeny

Forward-looking statements in memos can become disclosure issues under Reg FD and §10(b)

30-60 seconds*

Average Review Time

110+ compliance points analyzed*

Compliance Checks

Bank-level AES-256 encryption

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

Internal memoranda are double-edged documents — they enable rapid corporate decisions but become discovery exhibits in litigation, government investigations, and SEC proceedings. The attorney-client privilege under Upjohn v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981), and the work-product doctrine under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3) provide qualified protection for legal advice and litigation-anticipating analysis. Both are routinely waived by overbroad distribution, by failure to mark properly, or by including factual findings rather than legal advice. SEC Regulation FD (17 CFR §243.100) regulates selective disclosure of material non-public information; an internal memo circulated outside need-to-know channels can transform into a Reg FD violation if forwarded externally. Memos discussing pending transactions or litigation must consider §10(b) and §16(a) disclosure obligations. Justee reviews memos for proper privilege markings, distribution-list scope, factual versus legal characterizations, and disclosure exposure to flag waiver and reg-FD risks before circulation. Free, instant, attorney-aligned.

How It Works

1

Upload Your Document

Upload your contract in PDF, DOCX, or TXT format

2

AI Analysis

Our AI reviews your document for compliance issues

3

Review Findings

Get detailed findings with risk ratings and legal citations

4

Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve your document

What We Check

Verifies attorney-client privilege markings and recipient scope

Tests work-product anticipation-of-litigation triggers

Flags Reg FD selective-disclosure exposure

Reviews factual statements that could compromise privilege

Validates need-to-know distribution

Common Risks We Identify

Privilege label without counsel authorship

Distribution beyond need-to-know waives privilege

Factual investigation findings without Upjohn warning

Reg FD selective disclosure to analyst recipients

Forward-looking statements without §27A safe harbor

Hypothetical Case Study by Justee

Justee recently analyzed a 6-page memo titled "Board Memorandum — Litigation Outlook" distributed to the full board, GC office, and outside auditor for a public Delaware company's GC drafting a board memo on a potential securities-class-action threat.

Issue Found: The memo was attorney-authored and directed at legal advice, qualifying for both attorney-client privilege and work-product. But distribution to the outside auditor (a non-attorney, non-client party) waived privilege under United States v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 129 F.3d 681 (1st Cir. 1997). The auditor was therefore subject to subpoena for the memo, and so was every recipient downstream.

Justee Recommendation: For audit committee privileged materials, we now use a two-document protocol: a privileged legal memo to the audit committee only, plus a separate factual summary for the auditor that contains no privileged analysis. This protects privilege while satisfying the auditor's information needs.

Privilege Marking Without Author Identification

Problematic Language

"PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT"

Recommended Language

"PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT FROM: [Name], General Counsel (and at the direction of [Outside Firm]) TO: [Audit Committee / Specific Officers — Names] DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTED. DO NOT FORWARD WITHOUT COUNSEL APPROVAL. Forwarding may waive privilege. This Memorandum was prepared for the purpose of providing legal advice in connection with [matter] and in anticipation of [potential litigation/investigation]. It is intended for the named recipients only and contains attorney mental impressions and legal analysis protected under Upjohn v. United States and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)."

Why it matters: A bare privilege stamp does not establish privilege. The amended header documents counsel authorship, the legal-advice purpose, the litigation anticipation, the recipient list, and the no-forward direction.

No credit card required

"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process across all practice areas, transforming hours of work into minutes, while reducing stress and boosting accuracy."

Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Corporate Transactions at Grayver Law Group

AI Review vs. Manual Review

FeatureJustee AI ReviewManual Review
Review Time2-5 minutes2-4 hours
CostFree trial available$150-500+
Legal CitationsAutomaticVaries by reviewer
Clause SuggestionsIncludedExtra fee
Availability24/7 instantBusiness hours
* Comparison data represents estimates based on industry research and internal testing for typical contract types. Review times, costs, and accuracy percentages vary by document complexity, length, jurisdiction, and specific legal requirements. See full disclaimer below.

Official Resources

FRCP 26(b)(3) Work Product

Federal work-product doctrine

SEC Regulation FD

SEC Regulation FD selective disclosure

DOJ Privilege Guidance

DOJ corporate privilege guidance

Related Document Reviews

Board Agreement ReviewUnanimous Written Consent ReviewInvestigation Report ReviewNDA Review
Important Legal Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information and analysis provided by Justee AI is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to provide accurate and helpful information, our AI-powered service is not a substitute for professional legal counsel.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney-client relationship. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a Professional: For specific legal matters, we strongly recommend consulting with a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Legal requirements vary by location and circumstances, and only a licensed attorney can provide advice tailored to your specific situation.

Performance Estimates (*): All statistics, metrics, and numerical claims on this page — including review times, cost comparisons, accuracy percentages, and database size — are estimates based on internal testing, industry research, and typical use cases. Actual results vary based on document type, complexity, length, jurisdiction, and other factors. Cost comparisons reference publicly available average attorney rates and are not guaranteed savings. "1M+ laws and regulations" refers to the breadth of Justee's reference database and does not imply that every provision is checked against every law for every document.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Internal Memorandum / Legal Memo Review FAQ

Counsel-authored, for legal advice, marked properly, distributed only to need-to-know recipients, and not forwarded. Justee verifies all five conditions.

Generally no — sharing with the auditor waives privilege in most circuits. Justee flags auditor-distribution patterns and recommends two-document protocols.

FRCP 26(b)(3) protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation. Stronger than privilege for opinion work product. Justee identifies anticipation-of-litigation triggers.

Drafts can be privileged but are routinely produced if not marked. Justee recommends "Draft — Privileged" markings and limited circulation.

Yes. For public companies, Justee flags memos containing material non-public information distributed in patterns that could trigger Reg FD obligations.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Our system achieves 100% detection of standard PII types and approximately 97% overall coverage. Certain rare identifiers — such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses — may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

Ready to Review Your Document?

Upload your document above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: May 13, 2026

Privacy

Legal

Terms of servicePrivacy policy

About

About usContactsBlogAffiliate program

Follow us

LinkedIn
logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.